Why too many options can slow down decision-making and how recruiters can overcome it
If you have ever found yourself in the endless cereal aisle in your supermarket or spent ages picking a show to watch on your favourite streaming service, considering hundreds of options, you’ve likely experienced the paradox of choice. This concept, which was popularised by psychologist Barry Schwartz, explains that having too many options can actually make decision-making harder and often leads to:
Entry-level recruitment often attracts a high volume of applicants with similar qualifications and backgrounds. Most candidates have limited work experience, making it difficult to distinguish one from another. Here are the key challenges recruiters face:
👯👯 Overwhelming Similarity: With many entry-level candidates having similar resumes and cover letters (sometimes even generated by AI), it’s hard for recruiters to spot what makes one candidate stand out.
🎯 Difficulty Defining ‘Best Fit’: Since most candidates meet basic qualifications, defining who the “best” candidate is can feel subjective. In our recent azubi recruiters survey, 41% of respondents said that giving all candidates a fair chance is their highest priority. Yet, without clear criteria, recruiters often rely on gut feelings or minor details instead of a structured framework.
⏱️ Time Pressure: Fast hiring is crucial to avoid losing top candidates to competitors. A recent U-Form study found that 50% of German Azubis receive more than one apprenticeship offer. Without clear differentiators between candidates, the pressure to make quick decisions can feel overwhelming, especially with deadlines like the start of a trainee year approaching.
⚠️ Risk of not making the best choice possible: When there are too many similar candidates, recruiters may feel rushed to make decisions or play it safe, potentially missing out on the best talent. This can result in hires that don’t fully meet the company’s long-term needs.
📉 Unnecessarily reducing the talent tool: With a large number of applications to review, recruiters may accidentally overlook talent simply because they couldn’t find it in the overwhelming volume of candidates. This can shrink their talent pool and cause them to miss highly qualified candidates who would have been a great fit for the role.
We’ve created a self test, to help you figure this out. (The test will pop-up)
The paradox of choice explains why high-volume entry-level recruitment can feel stressful and difficult. Let’s explore some practical solutions to ensure a fair and efficient process:
A structured interview process ensures all candidates are assessed on the same criteria. This reduces bias and helps focus on factors like problem-solving skills or culture fit, instead of being distracted by similar resumes.
Using assessments like personality or skills tests provides insights beyond education and experience, allowing you to evaluate candidates on their actual abilities.
Video interviews help assess soft skills and motivation that aren’t visible on a resume. Candidates can show their personality, giving recruiters a better sense of fit. And as an added bonus: they are structured by default. (see point 1)
A scoring system quantifies factors such as skills, cultural fit, and interview performance. This helps rank candidates more objectively and makes hiring decisions clearer.
In summary, entry-level recruitment may often feel overwhelming, especially when faced with a flood of similar candidates. However, by adopting structured processes like standardised interviews, leveraging tools like video interviews and assessments, and using data-driven scoring systems, recruiters can streamline decision-making and focus on what truly matters—finding the best fit for the role. By implementing these strategies, you can reduce the stress of high-volume hiring, make fairer decisions, and secure young talent that aligns with your company’s long-term goals. The paradox of choice may be unavoidable, but with the right tools and approach, you can turn it into an opportunity for more effective hiring.
